Introductionl
Mergers are a common phenomenon in the commercial world, intended to streamline business operations, enhance competitiveness, or ensure economic survival. However, mergers affect not only shareholders and directors, but also third parties, such as employees, customers, and—most notably—the creditors of each of the merging corporations.
This article examines the status of creditors in corporate mergers, reviewing the legal protections available to them under applicable Israeli law, as well as discussing contractual mechanisms arising from agreements executed between the parties.
Mergers and Their Impact on Corporate Creditors
According to Section 1 of the Israeli Companies Law, 5759–1999, a “merger” refers to the transfer of all assets and liabilities—including contingent, future, known, and unknown obligations—of the target company to the absorbing company, resulting in the dissolution of the target company. In other words, a merger involves the consolidation of two or more corporations into a single legal entity, with all rights, assets, and obligations of the target company transferred to the absorbing company.
A merger can be implemented in various ways, but in all cases, it results in a fundamental change to the legal and financial structure of the merging entities.
Creditors are parties to whom the company owes a monetary debt or contractual obligation—such as banks, suppliers, bondholders, and service providers. During a merger, there is concern that changes in the identity or financial condition of the obligor company may alter the risk profile associated with the debt and/or company, potentially impairing its repayment ability and thereby infringing upon the creditors’ rights.
A merger has direct consequences for creditors, who are concerned about the solvency of the merged company. Even before the merger, there is a distinction between the interests of shareholders—who seek profitability and high returns—and those of creditors, who prioritize financial stability and low risk.
For instance, one way to assess financial risk is through the financial leverage ratio—that is, the ratio of liabilities to equity. A merger between companies with differing leverage levels may result in a higher risk profile for the absorbing company, which now assumes liability for the target company’s creditors. This increase in risk raises concerns about potential harm to those creditors.
A possible solution, available to creditors at the loan agreement stage, is to include provisions within loan or bond agreements that restrict or prohibit mergers without creditor consent. These provisions may include mechanisms for early repayment in the event of a merger (or any other material change in corporate structure), thereby allowing the creditor to exit the relationship in case of significant changes in the debtor’s identity or risk level.
Additionally, financial investors often include financial covenants in loan agreements that the borrower must satisfy throughout the loan term, such as: debt-to-asset ratios, minimum revenue thresholds, and similar benchmarks.
Statutory Protections for Creditors in Merger Transactions
Section 315 of the Companies Law reflects direct legislative intervention in the board of directors’ business judgment during merger evaluations. It imposes a clear restriction designed to protect the creditors of the merging entities. The section mandates that the board consider the financial condition of the companies involved and provides that if there is a reasonable concern that, as a result of the merger, the absorbing company will be unable to meet its obligations—or those of the dissolved company—the merger must not be approved.
This provision restricts the board’s discretion and prioritizes creditor protection over purely business considerations.
Section 318 of the Companies Law and the Companies Regulations (Mergers), 5760–2000, further establish the requirement that, before the approval and execution of a merger, advance notice must be given to the company’s creditors. These creditors are entitled to file objections to the proposed merger if there is a concern that the merged entity will be unable to fulfill its obligations to them.
Section 323 of the Companies Law stipulates that a merger may not be completed unless prior notice is provided to the company’s creditors. Each creditor has the right to object to the merger within 30 days of receiving notice. The court reviewing such objections may examine whether the merger prejudices creditor rights and may impose conditions for approval or deny the merger altogether.
These provisions illustrate the legislative balance between the desire to allow corporate flexibility and the duty to protect third parties. They reflect a regulatory approach that places upon the board of directors a responsibility to maintain financial stability and consider creditor interests when making critical decisions such as mergers.
In addition to statutory provisions, the company owes a duty of good faith toward its creditors—including full disclosure regarding the impact of the merger on debt structure, cash flow, and solvency.
When a creditor objection is brought before the court, the court essentially conducts a “solvency test”—namely, whether the post-merger company can repay its debts. The key factors in the court’s decision include: the financial stability of the absorbing company, its ability to repay debts following the merger, and whether the merger was executed in good faith and for the benefit of the company.
The court may grant a range of remedies, including approval or rejection of the merger, the requirement to provide guarantees for repayment, and the issuance of various orders to ensure creditor rights. The court’s authority in this context is anchored in Section 319 of the Companies Law.
Conclusion
Creditors form an integral part of a corporation’s financial ecosystem and may be adversely affected by a merger that alters the risk profile or identity of the debtor entity.
As outlined in this article, Israeli law acknowledges this concern and grants creditors the right to object to a proposed merger prior to its approval in court, in addition to requiring full disclosure from the merging companies.
Nevertheless, creditors themselves can proactively protect their interests through contractual mechanisms—such as clauses limiting mergers or conditioning them upon financial covenants and consent.
For further information, please contact:
Adv. Hanan Efraim – Tel: +972-3-691-6600 | Email: hanan@ekw.co.il
Adv. Amit Kubos – Tel: +972-3-691-6600 | Email: amit@ekw.co.il